Case Study: Bridging the Data Gap Between Coupa and NetSuite
How a Missing Field Became the Key to Unlocking Financial Efficiency. Re-engineering the Coupa–NetSuite Integration for Accuracy, Efficiency, and Audit Readiness
Role
Systems Analyst
Industry
Coupa (Procurement), Oracle NetSuite (ERP), iPaaS Integration Platform
Scope
Grants Management, Financial Systems Integration, and Compliance
The Challenge
Manual Reconciliation
Reliance on spreadsheets and
VLOOKUPs across Coupa and NetSuite.Staff effort consumed by low-value tasks.
Compliance Burden
Each grant has different rules on allowable/unallowable expenses.
Invoices must be manually opened and checked, introducing delays and errors.
Data Fragmentation
NetSuite had allocations and GL but no vendor/invoice data.
Coupa had vendor/invoice data but was disconnected from NetSuite reporting.
Operational Risk
Close cycles extended.
High costs if outsourced.
Errors expose the organization to audit risk and grant clawbacks.
The Investigation
Symptom: Grants administrators unable to tag and track expenses effectively.
Gap Identified: Vendor Bills in NetSuite missing key fields (Invoice Number, Supplier).
Hypothesis: The Invoice Number could act as the “golden key” across systems.
Discovery: The field did not exist in NetSuite at all — more than a mapping gap, it was a foundational flaw.
Root Cause:
Initial integration scope focused only on GL data.
No process mandate for invoice number capture.
Finance roles lacked system permissions to create needed fields.
The Solution (In Implementation)
Technology
Create custom, indexed Vendor Invoice Number field on Vendor Bills in NetSuite.
Modify iPaaS mappings to bring
Invoice NumberandSupplierfrom Coupa into NetSuite.Build/test in Sandbox, with formal UAT as the go-live gate.
Process
Establish Invoice Number as the golden key identifier linking systems.
Update SOP: invoices cannot be approved in Coupa if
Invoice Numberis blank.Create exception reports in NetSuite to flag missing invoice numbers.
People
Cross-functional team across Finance/AP, IT/Integration, and Procurement.
Engage AP staff in testing to ensure buy-in.
Communicate the “before vs. after” to drive adoption.
Anticipated Outcomes
Efficiency: 70–80% fewer hours spent on manual reconciliations.
Accuracy: Improved compliance by enforcing grant rules through system logic.
Audit Readiness: Exception reporting ensures transparency and reduces risk.
Cost Avoidance: Eliminates need for external tagging vendors.
Scalability: Supports growth in grant portfolio without proportional headcount.
Current Status
Field creation and mapping in sandbox underway.
SOP updates drafted.
UAT scheduled for next phase.
Key Takeaway
This case study demonstrates how root-cause diagnostics, data governance, and cross-functional collaboration can transform a high-cost, error-prone manual process into a scalable, compliance-driven system. The solution is designed not just to fix today’s pain points, but to create a foundation for automation and advanced financial reporting in the future.
Other projects
Case Study – Saint Mary School, Rajula
Pro Bono Financial Health Review
From Manual Tracker to Dynamic Dashboard: Revolutionizing Grants Finance Reporting
We traded our manual spreadsheets for a real-time, automated Looker dashboard. Here’s how it eliminated hours of tedious work and changed the way we present financial data to our leadership team.
Case Study: Bridging the Data Gap Between Coupa and NetSuite
How a Missing Field Became the Key to Unlocking Financial Efficiency. Re-engineering the Coupa–NetSuite Integration for Accuracy, Efficiency, and Audit Readiness